nsw chief scientist coal seam gas

Reports of … The independent review of coal seam gas activities in NSW (the Review) undertaken by the Chief Scientist & Engineer began in late February 2013. 794 Views November 01, 2014 Coal Seam Gas, Political Different Themes By Ross Verne INDUSTRY organisations and gas producers have celebrated chief scientist Mary O’Kane’s findings that the NSW coal seam gas industry is manageable, but both sides of politics maintain there is still work to be done. The campaign continues: Flashback to the Coonamble community march against CSG on 22 March 2014. May, 2013. https://ama.com.au/media/ama -calls coal seam gas health checks 5 Doctors for the Environment Australia. The Commissioner has access to the resources of all NSW Government agencies, including the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer, as well as other relevant bodies to seek advice on matters raised with the Commissioner. However, the state of readiness of the NSW Government to regulate the coal seam gas industry is now concluded to be almost nil, based on the Final Report of the Inquiry into the Implementation of the Recommendations of the Chief Scientist. The NSW Gas Plan sets out the regulations for all Coal Seam Gas (CSG) activities in the State. The Commissioner reports directly to the Secretary, NSW Department of Industry. In September 2014 the NSW Chief Scientist & Engineer, Professor Mary O'Kane, released the Final Report of the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW. In 2015, following widespread protests, the NSW government asked the state’s chief scientist to make recommendations to ensure that industry could safely extract coal seam gas. In 2013 the EPA commissioned comprehensive review by the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer of coal seam gas activities, focusing on impacts to human health and the environment. • The NSW Chief Scientist’s Final Report of the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW (2014), • NSW Gas Plan by the NSW State Government (2014) and • Upper Hunter Strategic Regional Land Use Plan (2012) Council recognises that it is not: • The consent authority for mining or CSG developments, Importantly, the NSW Gas Plan is based on the findings of the Chief Scientist and Engineer's Independent Review of CSG Activities in New South Wales.. "Coal seam gas projects must be assessed based on science, not based on politics. Submission to the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer Review of coal seam gas activities in NSW April 2013 “Public health experience indicates that in a range of environmental contamination issues prevention is the mainstay to protection. NATIONAL Party MPs from around NSW are bearing the brunt of a community backlash after a vote on the Coal Seam Gas Moratorium Bill was rushed through both houses of parliament in just over 24 hours. The moratorium would be reviewed in three years and that the moratorium could only be lifted if the industry could demonstrate that it was consistent with the 2014 Chief Scientist’s Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW and that it would not have any impact on the hydrology of any water source. By Ehssan Veiszadeh AAP October 1, 2014 9:03pm Examples include coal seam gas, sea level rise, road tunnel air quality coal dust emissions and Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination. Safeguards protecting water supplies from mining projects are inadequate and companies who conduct shonky monitoring should have their operations overhauled, the state's top scientist says. The purpose is to provide an overview of the key issues associated with produced water and solids in relation to CSG activities. NSW Gas Plan. This report is the final and overarching report of the Review. 27th February, 2020 the NSW Legislative Council tabled a Report on the Implementation of the recommendations contained in the NSW Chief Scientist's Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in New South Wales. This discretion has been used irresponsibly and in defiance of the NSW Chief Scientist’s recommendations of the prerequisites needed to establish a safe coal seam gas industry in NSW. "To back up that promise, we need to see action to implement the protections recommended by the Chief Scientist, before any decision is made about the Narrabri coal seam gas project. THE science is in – coal-seam gas has been, and can continue to be, safely harnessed for the good of consumers, jobs and gas-dependent NSW manufacturing. Coal seam gas (CSG) ... Its plan adopted all of the recommendations of an inquiry into the state’s CSG industry by the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer, Professor Mary O'Kane. THE NSW Chief Scientist will be invited to address a forum on coal seam gas in Cessnock, after councillors voted on Wednesday night to hold the forum. The NSW gas … The Terms of Reference for the Review are at Appendix 1. In developing the NSW Gas Plan, the Government has acted upon the independent advice of the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer, Professor Mary O'Kane, as set out in the Final Report of the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW (243 … As NSW Chief Scientist & Engineer, Professor Durrant-Whyte consults widely with academia, industry and government to ensure knowledge and research can be adapted and used to benefit NSW. Her work included conducting an independent review of coal seam gas related activities, focussing on human health and environmental impacts. The Final Report of the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW (PDF 243KB) made 16 recommendations, including Recommendation 9 which stated THE NSW chief scientist says there is a future for the controversial coal seam gas industry so long as the proper safeguards are established. The government placed a moratorium on coal seam gas activity in the catchment area pending the release of the Chief Scientist’s report, which was handed to the government on Friday night. That is the finding of the NSW Chief Scientist, after a comprehensive 18-month study. 3 Initial report on the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW, NSW Chief Scientist & Engineer July 2013, pg 98 4 AMA. The Council concluded that only 2 of the 16 original recommendations had been fully implemented.1 We urge them to hold faith with the NSW Chief Scientist’s recommendations and the farming communities fighting to protect groundwater from coal seam gas,’ she said. The long-awaited independent review of coal seam gas (CSG) in New South Wales, released last week by the NSW Chief Scientist, highlighted many … Campaigner Anne Kennedy front right. Think of lead or asbestos for example; adequate assessment and regulation are key measures.” (Shearman 2012) The New South Wales Farmers Association is backing a proposal for a three-tiered system to manage the risks associated with coal seam gas production.